ParleyLet AI disagree.
Then decide.
One conversation. Multiple participants.
Not "ask GPT, then ask Claude, then compare." Everyone is in the same Room, and can call on each other directly.
Bring your models
Register any of 9 providers (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Qwen, SEA-LION, Cohere, PLaMo) with your own API keys. You pay providers directly; Parley never marks up inference.
Open a Room
Every AI model and every person you invite becomes a Participant in the same conversation.
Let everyone talk
You and the AI Participants @mention each other and challenge assumptions. In Auto Mode, they can bring each other in on their own, within a budget you control, and turn to you directly the moment a call is truly yours to make.
Call for a Consensus
Any participant can flag that a summary would help. Agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty come back side by side, never forced into a false majority vote.
Built for genuine disagreement.
A single AI chat tends to just agree with you. Every piece of Parley exists to fix that.
Real disagreement, not agreement theater
A single AI tends to agree with whoever it's talking to. Parley's Participants push back on each other, and on you, when an argument doesn't hold up.
Consensus, not a blended answer
See where the group actually agrees and where it splits, instead of one smoothed-over response that papers over real disagreement.
Deep Research
Participants can search the web and cite their sources when it's genuinely useful, so disagreement is grounded in evidence, not just style.
Decisions that stick
When you actually decide something, it's recorded with the reasoning and the roster that produced it, so you can find it later instead of scrolling back through chat.
Keep the good parts
Select any AI's reply and save it as a note in one click. No more copying good ideas out of a long conversation by hand.
Auto Mode
Let Participants bring each other in and keep the discussion going on their own, within a budget you control, or stay in Human-guided mode and approve every step.
Assign roles, not just prompts
Skeptic, Advocate, Premise Challenger: give each AI a distinct job before a Brainstorming Room starts, so the disagreement is structured instead of random.
Compare independently, then see where they align
Broadcast one prompt to every model at once. Each answers without seeing the others. Then Parley shows you the real overlap and the real splits.
See where the models actually agree
Broadcast one question to every model at once. Each answers on its own. Then Parley shows you the real overlap.
I have a stable job I don't love, and a risky idea I actually care about. How should I think about this?
How ModelSight works
- No @mention (or @all) — sends to every model below at once. Each answers independently, without seeing anyone else's reply.
- @modelname — sends privately to just that one model. A side conversation that doesn't affect the broadcast or the pin/exclude order.
- @model1 @model2 — same idea for two or more specific models at once.
- Pin the ones you like to the front, or exclude ones you've ruled out — you can always bring them back.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Deeper analysis, powered by multiple AI models.
Good data sources are the foundation. What Parley adds is the analysis that comes after: a report that writes itself as the conversation continues, with prose, data, charts, and a table updating turn by turn. It's trustworthy because every model researches independently, then checks and disputes what the others found, live in the dashboard.
Recommendation
Once there's enough evidence, generate a recommendation grounded in what's been found so far.
Claims tracked
0
Well-corroborated
0
Sources cited
0
Providers
5
Research Activity by Model
Who researched what, and from which angle.
No claims yet — they'll appear here as Participants cite evidence.
Chat
Say hello, or @mention Gemini to bring them in.
Then decide, with everything on the table.
Any Participant can call for a Consensus summary: a structured snapshot of where the Room actually stands, not a forced majority vote.
Agreement
A vertical SaaS approach is the strongest starting point.
Disagreement
Gemini favors market size in India; Claude prioritizes distribution risk.
Uncertainty
Whether the target segment will pay before the product proves lock-in.
Open Questions
What's the minimum viable pricing tier?
Evidence
Two comparable vertical SaaS launches were cited as reference points.
Risks
Long enterprise sales cycles could stall early traction.
Next Steps
Ship a narrow MVP and validate it with ten target customers.
Built for people who take their data seriously.
BYOK only works if the keys are actually safe.
Encrypted the moment it arrives
Every API key is envelope-encrypted with Google Cloud KMS before it's ever written to disk.
Never used to train anything
Parley relays your messages to the AI you chose. We don't retain them for training, ours or anyone else's.
No markup, ever
You pay providers directly for inference. Parley only charges for the collaboration layer on top.
Try it free. Pay for what you actually use.
Start free. Starter and up unlock everything — Auto Mode, Research, Brainstorming — the only difference is how much Credit you get. Bring your own API key for BYOK's fully unlimited access.
Sign up and watch multiple AIs actually push back on each other.
- One-time trial Credit (~40 messages)
- 4 Rooms, up to 3 AI Participants
- Human-guided Mode
- Try Research and Brainstorming too
Enough for casual, everyday use.
- ~58 messages/day of Credit
- Flagship-model allowance (~2/mo)
- 1000 Rooms, up to 6 AI Participants
For daily brainstorming.
- ~149 messages/day of Credit (2.5x Starter)
- Flagship-model allowance (~12/mo)
For making flagship models your default.
- ~240 messages/day of Credit
- Flagship-model allowance (~70/mo)
Your own API key, no ceiling.
- No usage cap
- Unlimited access to every model
- Everything in Standard/Pro
Bring your own key.
Parley never touches your model's inference bill. You connect your own API key per provider, and pay that provider directly. Takes about a minute per model.
- 1Sign in at platform.openai.com
- 2Open API keys and create a new secret key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding an OpenAI Endpoint
- 1Sign in at console.anthropic.com
- 2Open Settings → API Keys and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding an Anthropic Endpoint
- 1Sign in at aistudio.google.com with your Google account
- 2Click "Get API key" and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a Google Endpoint
- 1Sign in at console.x.ai
- 2Open API Keys and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding an xAI Endpoint
- 1Sign in at console.mistral.ai
- 2Open API Keys and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a Mistral Endpoint
- 1Sign in at bailian.console.alibabacloud.com (international region)
- 2Open API Keys and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a Qwen Endpoint
- 1Sign in at the SEA-LION Playground
- 2Create a new trial API key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a SEA-LION Endpoint
- 1Sign in at dashboard.cohere.com
- 2Open API Keys and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a Cohere Endpoint
- 1Sign in at plamo.preferredai.jp
- 2Open the API console and create a new key
- 3Paste it into Parley when adding a PLaMo Endpoint
Every key is envelope-encrypted with Google Cloud KMS the moment it reaches us. Not even Parley's own staff can read it back out. See how in our Privacy Policy
Why "Parley"
A parley is a conversation held between opposing sides to settle a dispute: not a vote, not a single ruling, but a negotiated understanding reached by talking it through. That is exactly what happens when GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok are placed in the same Room: they hold different positions, and the goal isn't to force them into agreement, but to let the discussion itself surface what's actually true, uncertain, or still contested.
Bring your models. Open a Room.
Free to start, no credit card, ready in about a minute.